Back to Blog
Program like picasa for mac7/15/2023 As for retrieving pictures out of it's filing system without using iPhoto, Forget about it. It's just flawed software engineering and iPhoto should be overhauled entirely to rectify it. You load in too many Pictures, even a full blown G5 can end up struggling to efficiently render access to it's own thumbnail library. IPhoto is great for showcasing a moderate selection of your favourite photos, but I would never recommend it for archiving purposes. Though if you are not satisfied with its editing capabilities FastStone itself provides you with an option to use an external editing program, talk about being too modest. It allows you to make basic edits like cropping, adjusting the light, colors, curves and adding effects, etc. Obviously though, this is how Picasa works so effectively and probably worth the potential inconvenience. Any good programs like picasa for mac windows 10. The only issue I find bothersome with Picasa is that its thumbnail database is kept in order by invasively leaving tracking files in every folder on your Hard Drive/s that contains a picture image. ![]() Picasa is simply excellent FREE software, and I'm sad to say Windows users do have a one-up against us with this program. She now loves her PB, but refuses to transfer her archive of photo's until a Picasa for Mac (or equivalent) becomes available, I can't blame her. I've recently converted my mother to a Mac from Windows - well, mostly. This AI will identify the same person in your photos and organize it into a library separately. What makes it unique as compared to its competitors is that it has Facial Recognition AI. Although it has a paid plan, the free plan would be sufficient for users too. iTunes allows this type of option with MP3 Libraries so why not iPhoto? Phototheca is one of the best alternatives available to Picasa. The problem could simply be solved if iPhoto gave you an option not to import pictures into it's filing system, but rather keep them where they are. iPhoto's nonsensical filing system is just ridiculous. That said, count me in as one of the many waiting to find out.This is precisely the concern I have had too, ever since iPhoto was introduced. It remains to be seen if Picasa for Mac can go toe-to-toe with more mature, native solutions. I also use ACDSee Pro which handles some things more efficiently than PSP 9. Since Picasa doesn’t store it’s own library, but rather, merely catalogs photos elsewhere on your disk, we’ll have to see whether this translates into a performance advantage or disadvantage. PSP 9 is super friendly to use and works extremely fast for photo editing and best thing of all, it also supports most Photoshop plug-ins. I know people with well over 15,000 photos in their iPhoto collection, and the application is solid. What remains to be seen is whether or not Picasa is stable, whether or not it’s fast, and whether or not it can handle large photo libraries. Most of these features are certainly tied tighter into the OS, and while they will be missed, they are by no means deal-breakers. ![]() Also missing are the ability to order prints, an HTML export, and the fantastic Picasa Photo Viewer. There are some missing features in this beta: Geotagging didn’t make the cut, nor did webcam capture, screen capture, and screensaver. In fact, there is little doubt that Picasa is a much more robust application that iPhoto. Furthermore, Picasa features Google’s search tool, a bevy of organization tools, a plugin system using “buttons,” out-of-the-box integration with Gmail, Blogger, Picasa Web Albums, and the ability to make collages, movies, and more. ![]() Picasa, on the other hand, has an entire suite of tools for photo finishing. Although iPhoto works very well on the Mac and the iLife integration across applications is priceless, the fact remains that for serious editing and effects, the Mac user must venture outside of iPhoto. What I believe makes Picasa such a successful product is just how powerful it is. Clearly, there is demand for this product. As you can see, the post continues to receive comments and remains, to this day, one of the most visited entries on my site. I have chronicled, on my own blog, my wish for Picasa for Mac for about 3 years now. In addition, Picasa is tightly bound to Picasa Web Albums, the first 1GB of which is also free, in contrast with Apple’s MobileMe, which runs $99/year. Picasa is a free, powerful photo management tool that includes many photo editing operations that the Mac native iPhoto lacks. After far too long a wait, today, Google released the first beta of Picasa for Mac.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |